A decade of experience for high-needs beneficiaries under Medicare Advantage.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the association between longitudinal enrollment in Medicare Advantage (MA) and utilization, access, quality of care, and health outcomes for beneficiaries with complex health needs.

DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Beneficiary characteristics, enrollment, and outcomes data from the 2004-2016 waves of the Health and Retirement Study (HRS).

STUDY DESIGN: Using the HRS panel structure, we identified beneficiaries consistently reporting high needs as well as enrollment in MA versus traditional Medicare (TM). We first evaluated a robust set of beneficiary characteristics to identify those that distinguish beneficiaries who consistently enrolled in MA versus TM. We then described adjusted differences in outcomes between high-needs beneficiaries who consistently enrolled in MA versus TM.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Among high-needs beneficiaries, there was a modest amount of favorable selection into MA based on health. Controlling for several characteristics, MA enrollees used less care (with a 6.6 percentage point (pp) lower probability of hospitalization, 4.7 fewer physician visits, and a 5.1 pp lower probability of using home health care), had a 4.1 pp greater probability of being unable to afford their care, and had a 5.7 pp lower probability of reporting that they were very satisfied with their care. Compared to associations between MA and outcomes for high-needs beneficiaries, for non-high-needs beneficiaries MA enrollment was associated with smaller decreases in utilization and no statistically significant difference in the inability to afford care.

CONCLUSIONS: Our descriptive findings raise the possibility that high-needs beneficiaries may experience unique challenges in MA compared to their non-high-needs counterparts.