@article {6613, title = {Occupational injuries among older workers with disabilities: a prospective cohort study of the Health and Retirement Survey, 1992 to 1994.}, journal = {Am J Public Health}, volume = {88}, year = {1998}, month = {1998 Nov}, pages = {1691-5}, publisher = {88}, abstract = {

OBJECTIVES: We tested the hypothesis that among older workers, disabilities in general, and hearing and visual impairments in particular, are risk factors for occupational injuries.

METHODS: Using the first 2 interviews of the Health and Retirement Study, a nationally representative survey of Americans aged 51 to 61 years, we conducted a prospective cohort study of 5600 employed nonfarmers.

RESULTS: Testing a logistic regression model developed in a previous cross-sectional study, we found that the following occupations and risk factors were associated with occupational injury as estimated by odds ratios: service personnel, odds ratio = 1.71 (95\% confidence interval = 1.13, 2.57); mechanics and repairers, 3.47 (1.98, 6.10); operators and assemblers, 2.33 (1.51, 3.61); laborers, 3.16 (1.67, 5.98); jobs requiring heavy lifting, 2.05 (1.55, 2.70); self-employment, 0.50 (0.34, 0.73); and self-reported disability, 1.58 (1.14, 2.19). Replacing the general disability variable with specific hearing and visual impairment variables, we found that poor hearing (1.35 [0.95, 1.93]) and poor sight (1.45 [0.94, 2.22]) both had elevated odds ratios.

CONCLUSIONS: Poor sight and poor hearing, as well as work disabilities in general, are associated with occupational injuries among older workers.

}, keywords = {Accidents, Occupational, Age Distribution, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, Cross-Sectional Studies, Disabled Persons, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Logistic Models, Male, Middle Aged, Odds Ratio, Prospective Studies, Retirement, Risk Factors, United States}, issn = {0090-0036}, doi = {10.2105/ajph.88.11.1691}, url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9807538/}, author = {Zwerling, Craig and Nancy L. Sprince and Charles S. Davis and Paul S. Whitten and Robert B Wallace and Steven G Heeringa} } @article {6553, title = {Alcohol and Occupational Injuries among Older Workers}, journal = {Accident Analysis and Prevention}, volume = {28}, year = {1996}, pages = {371-6.}, publisher = {28}, keywords = {Demographics, Employment and Labor Force, Health Conditions and Status, Methodology, Risk Taking}, author = {Zwerling, Craig and Nancy L. Sprince and Robert B Wallace and Charles S. Davis and Paul S. Whitten and Steven G Heeringa} } @article {6552, title = {Risk factors for occupational injuries among older workers: an analysis of the health and retirement study.}, journal = {Am J Public Health}, volume = {86}, year = {1996}, month = {1996 Sep}, pages = {1306-9}, publisher = {86}, abstract = {

OBJECTIVES: This study examined risk factors for occupational injury among older workers.

METHODS: We analyzed data on 6854 employed nonfarmers from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), a population-based sample of Americans 51 through 61 years old.

RESULTS: Occupational injuries were associated with the following: the occupations of mechanics and repairers (odds ratio [OR] = 2.27), service personnel (OR = 1.68), and laborers (OR = 2.18); jobs requiring heavy lifting (OR = 2.75); workers{\textquoteright} impaired hearing (OR = 1.60) and impaired vision (OR = 1.53); and jobs requiring good vision (OR = 1.43). Self-employment was associated with fewer injuries (OR = 0.47).

CONCLUSIONS: These results emphasize the importance of a good match between job demands and worker capabilities.

}, keywords = {Accidents, Occupational, Cross-Sectional Studies, Educational Status, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Occupational Diseases, Regression Analysis, Retirement, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, United States, Wounds and Injuries}, issn = {0090-0036}, doi = {10.2105/ajph.86.9.1306}, author = {Zwerling, Craig and Nancy L. Sprince and Robert B Wallace and Charles S. Davis and Paul S. Whitten and Steven G Heeringa} } @article {6534, title = {Effect of recall period on the reporting of occupational injuries among older workers in the Health and Retirement Study.}, journal = {Am J Ind Med}, volume = {28}, year = {1995}, month = {1995 Nov}, pages = {583-90}, publisher = {28}, abstract = {

Studies of injury morbidity often rely on self-reported survey data. In designing these surveys, researchers must chose between a shorter recall period to minimize recall bias and a longer period to maximize the precision of rate estimates. Using data from the Health and Retirement Study, which employed a recall period of 1 year, we examined the effect of the recall period on rates of occupational injuries among older workers as well as upon rate ratios of these injuries for nine risk factors. We fit a stochastic model to the occupational injury rates as a function of time before the interview and used this model to estimate what the injury rates would have been had we used a 4-week recall period. The adjusted occupational injury rate of 5.9 injuries per 100 workers per year was 36\% higher than the rate based on a 1-year recall period. Adjustment for recall period had much less effect on rate ratios, which typically varied by < 10\%. Our work suggests that self-reported surveys with longer recall periods may be used to estimate occupational injury rates and also may be useful in studying the associations between occupational injuries and a variety of risk factors.

}, keywords = {Accidents, Occupational, Adult, Aged, Bias, Cross-Sectional Studies, Data collection, Female, Humans, Incidence, Linear Models, Male, Mental Recall, Middle Aged, Models, Statistical, Reproducibility of Results, Retirement, Risk Factors, Time Factors, United States}, issn = {0271-3586}, doi = {10.1002/ajim.4700280503}, author = {Zwerling, Craig and Nancy L. Sprince and Robert B Wallace and Charles S. Davis and Paul S. Whitten and Steven G Heeringa} } @article {6538, title = {Occupational Injuries Among Agricultural Workers 51 to 61 Years Old: A National Study}, journal = {Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health}, volume = {1}, year = {1995}, pages = {273-281}, publisher = {1}, abstract = {This paper examines risk factors for occupational injuries among agricultural workers and compares them with the risk factors for injury among other older workers. The findings suggest that the risks for occupational injuries among agricultural workers differ from those that affect workers in all other occupations. While heavy lifting and poor eye sight were risk factors for both agricultural and other workers, self-employment- - which acted as a protective factor for other workers- - proved to be a risk factor for agricultural workers. Other variables - depressive symptoms and dissatisfaction with marriage, job, family life, the way problems are handled, and life overall - tended to be more strongly associated with occupational injuries in agricultural workers than among other workers.}, keywords = {Demographics, Employment and Labor Force, Health Conditions and Status, Net Worth and Assets}, doi = {10.13031/2013.19469}, url = {https://elibrary.asabe.org/abstract.asp?search=1\&JID=3\&AID=19469\&CID=j1995\&v=1\&i=4\&T=1\&urlRedirect=[anywhere=\&keyword=\&abstract=\&title=on\&author=\&references=\&docnumber=\&journals=All\&searchstring=Occupational\%20Injuries\%20among\%20Agricultural\%20Workers\&pg=}, author = {Zwerling, Craig and Nancy L. Sprince and Robert B Wallace and Charles S. Davis and Paul S. Whitten and Steven G Heeringa} }