@article {10277, title = {Chiropractic use in the Medicare population: prevalence, patterns, and associations with 1-year changes in health and satisfaction with care.}, journal = {J Manipulative Physiol Ther}, volume = {37}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Oct}, pages = {542-51}, abstract = {

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine how chiropractic care compares to medical treatments on 1-year changes in self-reported function, health, and satisfaction with care measures in a representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries.

METHODS: Logistic regression using generalized estimating equations is used to model the effect of chiropractic relative to medical care on decline in 5 functional measures and 2 measures of self-rated health among 12170 person-year observations. The same method is used to estimate the comparative effect of chiropractic on 6 satisfaction with care measures. Two analytic approaches are used, the first assuming no selection bias and the second using propensity score analyses to adjust for selection effects in the outcome models.

RESULTS: The unadjusted models show that chiropractic is significantly protective against 1-year decline in activities of daily living, lifting, stooping, walking, self-rated health, and worsening health after 1 year. Persons using chiropractic are more satisfied with their follow-up care and with the information provided to them. In addition to the protective effects of chiropractic in the unadjusted model, the propensity score results indicate a significant protective effect of chiropractic against decline in reaching.

CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence of a protective effect of chiropractic care against 1-year declines in functional and self-rated health among Medicare beneficiaries with spine conditions, and indications that chiropractic users have higher satisfaction with follow-up care and information provided about what is wrong with them.

}, keywords = {Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Manipulation, Chiropractic, Medicare, Patient Satisfaction, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, United States}, issn = {1532-6586}, doi = {10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.08.003}, url = {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25233887}, author = {Paula A Weigel and Jason Hockenberry and Frederic D Wolinsky} } @article {10278, title = {The comparative effect of episodes of chiropractic and medical treatment on the health of older adults.}, journal = {J Manipulative Physiol Ther}, volume = {37}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Mar-Apr}, pages = {143-54}, abstract = {

OBJECTIVES: The comparative effect of chiropractic vs medical care on health, as used in everyday practice settings by older adults, is not well understood. The purpose of this study is to examine how chiropractic compares to medical treatment in episodes of care for uncomplicated back conditions. Episodes of care patterns between treatment groups are described, and effects on health outcomes among an older group of Medicare beneficiaries over a 2-year period are estimated.

METHODS: Survey data from the nationally representative Survey on Assets and Health Dynamics among the Oldest Old were linked to participants{\textquoteright} Medicare Part B claims under a restricted Data Use Agreement with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Logistic regression was used to model the effect of chiropractic use in an episode of care relative to medical treatment on declines in function and well-being among a clinically homogenous older adult population. Two analytic approaches were used, the first assumed no selection bias and the second using propensity score analyses to adjust for selection effects in the outcome models.

RESULTS: Episodes of care between treatment groups varied in duration and provider visit pattern. Among the unadjusted models, there was no significant difference between chiropractic and medical episodes of care. The propensity score results indicate a significant protective effect of chiropractic against declines in activities of daily living (ADLs), instrumental ADLs, and self-rated health (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.49; AOR, 0.62; and AOR, 0.59, respectively). There was no difference between treatment types on declines in lower body function or depressive symptoms.

CONCLUSION: The findings from this study suggest that chiropractic use in episodes of care for uncomplicated back conditions has protective effects against declines in ADLs, instrumental ADLs, and self-rated health for older Medicare beneficiaries over a 2-year period.

}, keywords = {Activities of Daily Living, Aged, 80 and over, Back Pain, Episode of Care, Female, Humans, Male, Manipulation, Chiropractic, Treatment Outcome}, issn = {1532-6586}, doi = {10.1016/j.jmpt.2013.12.009}, url = {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24636108}, author = {Paula A Weigel and Jason Hockenberry and Suzanne E Bentler and Frederic D Wolinsky} } @article {10279, title = {Chiropractic use and changes in health among older medicare beneficiaries: a comparative effectiveness observational study.}, journal = {J Manipulative Physiol Ther}, volume = {36}, year = {2013}, month = {2013 Nov-Dec}, pages = {572-84}, abstract = {

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of chiropractic on 5 outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries: increased difficulties performing activities of daily living (ADLs), instrumental ADLs (IADLs), and lower body functions, as well as lower self-rated health and increased depressive symptoms.

METHODS: Among all beneficiaries, we estimated the effect of chiropractic use on changes in health outcomes among those who used chiropractic compared with those who did not, and among beneficiaries with back conditions, we estimated the effect of chiropractic use relative to medical care, both during a 2- to 15-year period. Two analytic approaches were used--one assumed no selection bias, whereas the other adjusted for potential selection bias using propensity score methods.

RESULTS: Among all beneficiaries, propensity score analyses indicated that chiropractic use led to comparable outcomes for ADLs, IADLs, and depressive symptoms, although there were increased risks associated with chiropractic for declines in lower body function and self-rated health. Propensity score analyses among beneficiaries with back conditions indicated that chiropractic use led to comparable outcomes for ADLs, IADLs, lower body function, and depressive symptoms, although there was an increased risk associated with chiropractic use for declines in self-rated health.

CONCLUSION: The evidence in this study suggests that chiropractic treatment has comparable effects on functional outcomes when compared with medical treatment for all Medicare beneficiaries, but increased risk for declines in self-rated health among beneficiaries with back conditions.

}, keywords = {Activities of Daily Living, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cohort Studies, Databases, Factual, Disability Evaluation, Female, Geriatric Assessment, Humans, Low Back Pain, Male, Manipulation, Chiropractic, Medicare, Mobility Limitation, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Patient Satisfaction, Quality of Life, Risk Assessment, Sex Factors, Treatment Outcome, United States}, issn = {1532-6586}, doi = {10.1016/j.jmpt.2013.08.008}, url = {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24636108}, author = {Paula A Weigel and Jason Hockenberry and Suzanne E Bentler and Frederic D Wolinsky} } @article {10280, title = {Chiropractic episodes and the co-occurrence of chiropractic and health services use among older Medicare beneficiaries.}, journal = {Journal of Manipulative \& Physiological Therapeutics}, volume = {35}, year = {2012}, pages = {168-175}, abstract = {

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to define and characterize episodes of chiropractic care among older Medicare beneficiaries and to evaluate the extent to which chiropractic services were used in tandem with conventional medicine.

METHODS: Medicare Part B claims histories for 1991 to 2007 were linked to the nationally representative survey on Assets and Health Dynamics among the Oldest Old baseline interviews (1993-1994) to define episodes of chiropractic sensitive care using 4 approaches. Chiropractic and nonchiropractic patterns of service use were examined within these episodes of care. Of the 7447 Assets and Health Dynamics among the Oldest Old participants, 971 used chiropractic services and constituted the analytic sample.

RESULTS: There were substantial variations in the number and duration of episodes and the type and volume of services used across the 4 definitions. Depending on how the episode was constructed, the mean number of episodes per chiropractic user ranged from 3.74 to 23.12, the mean episode duration ranged from 4.7 to 28.8 days, the mean number of chiropractic visits per episode ranged from 0.88 to 2.8, and the percentage of episodes with co-occurrent use of chiropractic and nonchiropractic providers ranged from 4.9\% to 10.9\% over the 17-year period.

CONCLUSION: Treatment for back-related musculoskeletal conditions was sought from a variety of providers, but there was little co-occurrent service use or coordinated care across provider types within care episodes. Chiropractic treatment dosing patterns in everyday practice were much lower than that used in clinical trial protocols designed to establish chiropractic efficacy for back-related conditions.

}, keywords = {Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Chiropractic, Combined Modality Therapy, Episode of Care, Female, Geriatric Assessment, Health Care Surveys, Health Services, Humans, Incidence, Insurance Claim Reporting, Low Back Pain, Medicare Part B, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Primary Health Care, Retrospective Studies, Sex Factors, Treatment Outcome, United States}, issn = {1532-6586}, doi = {10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.01.011}, author = {Paula A Weigel and Jason Hockenberry and Suzanne E Bentler and Kaskie, Brian and Frederic D Wolinsky} } @article {7579, title = {Long-term declines in ADLs, IADLs, and mobility among older Medicare beneficiaries.}, journal = {BMC Geriatr}, volume = {11}, year = {2011}, month = {2011 Aug 16}, pages = {43}, publisher = {11}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Most prior studies have focused on short-term (<= 2 years) functional declines. But those studies cannot address aging effects inasmuch as all participants have aged the same amount. Therefore, the authors studied the extent of long-term functional decline in older Medicare beneficiaries who were followed for varying time lengths, and the authors also identified the risk factors associated with those declines.

METHODS: The analytic sample included 5,871 self- or proxy-respondents who had complete baseline and follow-up survey data that could be linked to their Medicare claims for 1993-2007. Functional status was assessed using activities of daily living (ADLs), instrumental ADLs (IADLs), and mobility limitations, with declines defined as the development of two of more new difficulties. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to focus on the associations involving respondent status, health lifestyle, continuity of care, managed care status, health shocks, and terminal drop.

RESULTS: The average amount of time between the first and final interviews was 8.0 years. Declines were observed for 36.6\% on ADL abilities, 32.3\% on IADL abilities, and 30.9\% on mobility abilities. Functional decline was more likely to occur when proxy-reports were used, and the effects of baseline function on decline were reduced when proxy-reports were used. Engaging in vigorous physical activity consistently and substantially protected against functional decline, whereas obesity, cigarette smoking, and alcohol consumption were only associated with mobility declines. Post-baseline hospitalizations were the most robust predictors of functional decline, exhibiting a dose-response effect such that the greater the average annual number of hospital episodes, the greater the likelihood of functional status decline. Participants whose final interview preceded their death by one year or less had substantially greater odds of functional status decline.

CONCLUSIONS: Both the additive and interactive (with functional status) effects of respondent status should be taken into consideration whenever proxy-reports are used. Encouraging exercise could broadly reduce the risk of functional decline across all three outcomes, although interventions encouraging weight reduction and smoking cessation would only affect mobility declines. Reducing hospitalization and re-hospitalization rates could also broadly reduce the risk of functional decline across all three outcomes.

}, keywords = {Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cohort Studies, Disabled Persons, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Geriatric Assessment, Health Surveys, Humans, Insurance Benefits, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Medicare, Mobility Limitation, Prospective Studies, Time Factors, United States}, issn = {1471-2318}, doi = {10.1186/1471-2318-11-43}, author = {Frederic D Wolinsky and Suzanne E Bentler and Jason Hockenberry and Michael P Jones and Maksym Obrizan and Paula A Weigel and Kaskie, Brian and Robert B Wallace} } @article {8939, title = {Older adults who persistently present to the emergency department with severe, non-severe, and indeterminate episode patterns.}, journal = {BMC Geriatrrics}, volume = {11}, year = {2011}, pages = {65}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: It is well known that older adults figure prominently in the use of emergency departments (ED) across the United States. Previous research has differentiated ED visits by levels of clinical severity and found health status and other individual characteristics distinguished severe from non-severe visits. In this research, we classified older adults into population groups that persistently present with severe, non-severe, or indeterminate patterns of ED episodes. We then contrasted the three groups using a comprehensive set of covariates.

METHODS: Using a unique dataset linking individual characteristics with Medicare claims for calendar years 1991-2007, we identified patterns of ED use among the large, nationally representative AHEAD sample consisting of 5,510 older adults. We then classified one group of older adults who persistently presented to the ED with clinically severe episodes and another group who persistently presented to the ED with non-severe episodes. These two groups were contrasted using logistic regression, and then contrasted against a third group with a persistent pattern of ED episodes with indeterminate levels of severity using multinomial logistic regression. Variable selection was based on Andersen{\textquoteright}s behavioral model of health services use and featured clinical status, demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, health behaviors, health service use patterns, local health care supply, and other contextual effects.

RESULTS: We identified 948 individuals (17.2\% of the entire sample) who presented a pattern in which their ED episodes were typically defined as severe and 1,076 individuals (19.5\%) who typically presented with non-severe episodes. Individuals who persistently presented to the ED with severe episodes were more likely to be older (AOR 1.52), men (AOR 1.28), current smokers (AOR 1.60), experience diabetes (AOR (AOR 1.80), heart disease (AOR 1.70), hypertension (AOR 1.32) and have a greater amount of morbidity (AOR 1.48) than those who persistently presented to the ED with non-severe episodes. When contrasted with 1,177 individuals with a persistent pattern of indeterminate severity ED use, persons with severe patterns were older (AOR 1.36), more likely to be obese (AOR 1.36), and experience heart disease (AOR 1.49) and hypertension (AOR 1.36) while persons with non-severe patterns were less likely to smoke (AOR 0.63) and have diabetes (AOR 0.67) or lung disease (AOR 0.58).

CONCLUSIONS: We distinguished three large, readily identifiable groups of older adults which figure prominently in the use of EDs across the United States. Our results suggest that one group affects the general capacity of the ED to provide care as they persistently present with severe episodes requiring urgent staff attention and greater resource allocation. Another group persistently presents with non-severe episodes and creates a considerable share of the excess demand for ED care. Future research should determine how chronic disease management programs and varied co-payment obligations might impact the use of the ED by these two large and distinct groups of older adults with consistent ED use patterns.

}, keywords = {Emergency services, Health Shocks, Medicare/Medicaid/Health Insurance, Older Adults}, issn = {1471-2318}, doi = {10.1186/1471-2318-11-65}, author = {Kaskie, Brian and Maksym Obrizan and Michael P Jones and Suzanne E Bentler and Paula A Weigel and Jason Hockenberry and Robert B Wallace and Robert L. Ohsfeldt and Gary E Rosenthal and Frederic D Wolinsky} } @article {7580, title = {A prospective cohort study of long-term cognitive changes in older Medicare beneficiaries.}, journal = {BMC Public Health}, volume = {11}, year = {2011}, month = {2011 Sep 20}, pages = {710}, publisher = {11}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Promoting cognitive health and preventing its decline are longstanding public health goals, but long-term changes in cognitive function are not well-documented. Therefore, we first examined long-term changes in cognitive function among older Medicare beneficiaries in the Survey on Assets and Health Dynamics among the Oldest Old (AHEAD), and then we identified the risk factors associated with those changes in cognitive function.

METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of a prospective, population-based cohort using baseline (1993-1994) interview data linked to 1993-2007 Medicare claims to examine cognitive function at the final follow-up interview which occurred between 1995-1996 and 2006-2007. Besides traditional risk factors (i.e., aging, age, race, and education) and adjustment for baseline cognitive function, we considered the reason for censoring (entrance into managed care or death), and post-baseline continuity of care and major health shocks (hospital episodes). Residual change score multiple linear regression analysis was used to predict cognitive function at the final follow-up using data from telephone interviews among 3,021 to 4,251 (sample size varied by cognitive outcome) baseline community-dwelling self-respondents that were >= 70 years old, not in managed Medicare, and had at least one follow-up interview as self-respondents. Cognitive function was assessed using the 7-item Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS-7; general mental status), and the 10-item immediate and delayed (episodic memory) word recall tests.

RESULTS: Mean changes in the number of correct responses on the TICS-7, and 10-item immediate and delayed word recall tests were -0.33, -0.75, and -0.78, with 43.6\%, 54.9\%, and 52.3\% declining and 25.4\%, 20.8\%, and 22.9\% unchanged. The main and most consistent risks for declining cognitive function were the baseline values of cognitive function (reflecting substantial regression to the mean), aging (a strong linear pattern of increased decline associated with greater aging, but with diminishing marginal returns), older age at baseline, dying before the end of the study period, lower education, and minority status.

CONCLUSIONS: In addition to aging, age, minority status, and low education, substantial and differential risks for cognitive change were associated with sooner vs. later subsequent death that help to clarify the terminal drop hypothesis. No readily modifiable protective factors were identified.

}, keywords = {Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Cohort Studies, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Medicare, Mental Health, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Prospective Studies, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, United States}, issn = {1471-2458}, doi = {10.1186/1471-2458-11-710}, author = {Frederic D Wolinsky and Suzanne E Bentler and Jason Hockenberry and Michael P Jones and Paula A Weigel and Kaskie, Brian and Robert B Wallace} } @article {7527, title = {A longitudinal study of chiropractic use among older adults in the United States.}, journal = {Chiropr Osteopat}, volume = {18}, year = {2010}, month = {2010 Dec 21}, pages = {34}, publisher = {18}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Longitudinal patterns of chiropractic use in the United States, particularly among Medicare beneficiaries, are not well documented. Using a nationally representative sample of older Medicare beneficiaries we describe the use of chiropractic over fifteen years, and classify chiropractic users by annual visit volume. We assess the characteristics that are associated with chiropractic use versus nonuse, as well as between different levels of use.

METHODS: We analyzed data from two linked sources: the baseline (1993-1994) interview responses of 5,510 self-respondents in the Survey on Assets and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old (AHEAD), and their Medicare claims from 1993 to 2007. Binomial logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with chiropractic use versus nonuse, and conditional upon use, to identify factors associated with high volume relative to lower volume use.

RESULTS: There were 806 users of chiropractic in the AHEAD sample yielding a full period prevalence for 1993-2007 of 14.6\%. Average annual prevalence between 1993 and 2007 was 4.8\% with a range from 4.1\% to 5.4\%. Approximately 42\% of the users consumed chiropractic services only in a single calendar year while 38\% used chiropractic in three or more calendar years. Chiropractic users were more likely to be women, white, overweight, have pain, have multiple comorbid conditions, better self-rated health, access to transportation, higher physician utilization levels, live in the Midwest, and live in an area with fewer physicians per capita. Among chiropractic users, 16\% had at least one year in which they exceeded Medicare{\textquoteright}s "soft cap" of 12 visits per calendar year. These over-the-cap users were more likely to have arthritis and mobility limitations, but were less likely to have a high school education. Additionally, these over-the-cap individuals accounted for 58\% of total chiropractic claim volume. High volume users saw chiropractors the most among all types of providers, even more than family practice and internal medicine combined.

CONCLUSION: There is substantial heterogeneity in the patterns of use of chiropractic services among older adults. In spite of the variability of use patterns, however, there are not many characteristics that distinguish high volume users from lower volume users. While high volume users accounted for a significant portion of claims, the enforcement of a hard cap on annual visits by Medicare would not significantly decrease overall claim volume. Further research to understand the factors causing high volume chiropractic utilization among older Americans is warranted to discern between patterns of "need" and patterns of "health maintenance".

}, issn = {1746-1340}, doi = {10.1186/1746-1340-18-34}, author = {Paula A Weigel and Jason Hockenberry and Suzanne E Bentler and Maksym Obrizan and Kaskie, Brian and Michael P Jones and Robert L. Ohsfeldt and Gary E Rosenthal and Robert B Wallace and Frederic D Wolinsky} } @article {7484, title = {Prior hospitalization and the risk of heart attack in older adults: a 12-year prospective study of Medicare beneficiaries.}, journal = {J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci}, volume = {65}, year = {2010}, month = {2010 Jul}, pages = {769-77}, publisher = {65}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: We investigated whether prior hospitalization was a risk factor for heart attacks among older adults in the survey on Assets and Health Dynamics among the Oldest Old.

METHODS: Baseline (1993-1994) interview data were linked to 1993-2005 Medicare claims for 5,511 self-respondents aged 70 years and older and not enrolled in managed Medicare. Primary hospital International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) 410.xx discharge codes identified postbaseline hospitalizations for acute myocardial infarctions (AMIs). Participants were censored at death or postbaseline managed Medicare enrollment. Traditional risk factors and other covariates were included. Recent postbaseline non-AMI hospitalizations (ie, prior hospitalizations) were indicated by a time-dependent marker, and sensitivity analyses identified their peak effect.

RESULTS: The total number of person-years of surveillance was 44,740 with a mean of 8.1 (median = 9.1) per person. Overall, 483 participants (8.8\%) suffered postbaseline heart attacks, with 423 participants (7.7\%) having their first-ever AMI. As expected, significant traditional risk factors were sex (men); race (whites); marital status (never being married); education (noncollege); geography (living in the South); and reporting a baseline history of angina, arthritis, diabetes, and heart disease. Risk factors were similar for both any postbaseline and first-ever postbaseline AMI analyses. The time-dependent recent non-AMI hospitalization marker did not alter the effects of the traditional risk factors but increased AMI risk by 366\% (adjusted hazards ratio = 4.66, p < .0001). Discussion. Our results suggest that some small percentage (<3\%) of heart attacks among older adults might be prevented if effective short-term postdischarge planning and monitoring interventions were developed and implemented.

}, keywords = {Aged, Educational Status, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Marital Status, Medicare, Myocardial Infarction, Patient Discharge, Proportional Hazards Models, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, United States}, issn = {1758-535X}, doi = {10.1093/gerona/glq003}, author = {Frederic D Wolinsky and Suzanne E Bentler and Li Liu and Michael P Jones and Kaskie, Brian and Jason Hockenberry and Elizabeth A Chrischilles and Kara B Wright and John F Geweke and Maksym Obrizan and Robert L. Ohsfeldt and Gary E Rosenthal and Robert B Wallace} }