@article {7452, title = {Clinical complexity in middle-aged and older adults with diabetes: the Health and Retirement Study.}, journal = {Med Care}, volume = {48}, year = {2010}, month = {2010 Apr}, pages = {327-34}, publisher = {48}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Some patients with diabetes may have health status characteristics that could make diabetes self-management (DSM) difficult and lead to inadequate glycemic control, or limit the benefit of some diabetes management interventions.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate how many older and middle-aged adults with diabetes have such health status characteristics.

DESIGN: Secondary data analysis of a nationally representative health interview survey, the Health and Retirement Study, and its diabetes mail-out survey.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Americans aged 51 and older with diabetes (n = 3506 representing 13.6 million people); aged 56 and older in diabetes survey (n = 1132, representing 9.9 million).

MEASUREMENTS: Number of adults with diabetes and (a) relatively good health; (b) health status that could make DSM difficult (eg, comorbidities, impaired instrumental activities of daily living; and (c) characteristics like advanced dementia and activities of daily living dependency that could limit benefit of some diabetes management. Health and Retirement Study measures included demographics. Diabetes Survey included self-measured HbA1c.

RESULTS: Nearly 22\% of adults > or =51 with diabetes (about 3 million people) have health characteristics that could make DSM difficult. Another 10\% (1.4 million) may receive limited benefit from some diabetes management. Mail-out respondents with health characteristics that could make DSM difficult had significantly higher mean HbA1c compared with people with relatively good health (7.6\% vs. 7.3\%, P < 0.04.).

CONCLUSIONS: Some middle-aged as well as older adults with diabetes have health status characteristics that might make DSM difficult or of limited benefit. Current diabetes quality measures, including measures of glycemic control, may not reflect what is possible or optimal for all patient groups.

}, keywords = {Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Complications, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Glycemic Index, Health Status, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Health Care, Self Care, Severity of Illness Index, Treatment Failure, United States}, issn = {1537-1948}, doi = {10.1097/mlr.0b013e3181ca4035}, author = {Caroline S Blaum and Christine T Cigolle and Cynthia Boyd and Jennifer L. Wolff and Zhiyi Tian and Kenneth M. Langa and David R Weir} } @article {7168, title = {Mechanisms for racial and ethnic disparities in glycemic control in middle-aged and older Americans in the health and retirement study.}, journal = {Arch Intern Med}, volume = {167}, year = {2007}, month = {2007 Sep 24}, pages = {1853-60}, publisher = {167}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Mechanisms for racial/ethnic disparities in glycemic control are poorly understood.

METHODS: A nationally representative sample of 1901 respondents 55 years or older with diabetes mellitus completed a mailed survey in 2003; 1233 respondents completed valid at-home hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) kits. We constructed multivariate regression models with survey weights to examine racial/ethnic differences in HbA(1c) control and to explore the association of HbA(1c) level with sociodemographic and clinical factors, access to and quality of diabetes health care, and self-management behaviors and attitudes.

RESULTS: There were no significant racial/ethnic differences in HbA(1c) levels in respondents not taking antihyperglycemic medications. In 1034 respondents taking medications, the mean HbA(1c) value (expressed as percentage of total hemoglobin) was 8.07\% in black respondents and 8.14\% in Latino respondents compared with 7.22\% in white respondents (P < .001). Black respondents had worse medication adherence than white respondents, and Latino respondents had more diabetes-specific emotional distress (P < .001). Adjusting for hypothesized mechanisms accounted for 14.0\% of the higher HbA(1c) levels in black respondents and 19.0\% in Latinos, with the full model explaining 22.0\% of the variance. Besides black and Latino ethnicity, only insulin use (P < .001), age younger than 65 years (P = .007), longer diabetes duration (P = .004), and lower self-reported medication adherence (P = .04) were independently associated with higher HbA(1c) levels.

CONCLUSIONS: Latino and African American respondents had worse glycemic control than white respondents. Socioeconomic, clinical, health care, and self-management measures explained approximately a fifth of the HbA(1c) differences. One potentially modifiable factor for which there were racial disparities--medication adherence--was among the most significant independent predictors of glycemic control.

}, keywords = {Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Black People, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Health Services Accessibility, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Socioeconomic factors, Treatment Refusal, United States, White People}, issn = {0003-9926}, doi = {10.1001/archinte.167.17.1853}, author = {Michele M Heisler and Jessica Faul and Rodney A. Hayward and Kenneth M. Langa and Caroline S Blaum and David R Weir} } @article {7005, title = {The Effect of Diabetes on Diability in Middle-Aged and Older Adults}, journal = {The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Medical Sciences}, volume = {60A}, year = {2005}, pages = {1206-1211}, publisher = {60A}, abstract = {Background. Physical disability is increasingly recognized as an adverse health consequence of type 2 diabetes in older adults. We studied the effect of diabetes on disability in middle-aged and older adults to: 1) characterize the association of diabetes with physical disability in middle-aged adults, and 2) determine the extent to which the effect of diabetes is explained by related covariates in either or both age groups. Methods. We used data from two parallel national panel studies of middle-aged and older adults to study the effect of self-reported diabetes at baseline on disability 2 years later, adjusting for baseline covariates. Results. Diabetes was strongly associated with subsequent physical disability (measured by a composite variable combining activities of daily living, mobility, and strength tasks) in middle-aged and older adults. Controlling for socioeconomic characteristics and common diabetes-related and unrelated comorbidities and conditions reduced the diabetes effect substantially, but it remained a significant predictor of disability in both groups. Conclusions. Our analyses demonstrated that disability is an important diabetes-related health outcome in middle-aged and older adults that should be prevented or mitigated through appropriate diabetes management.}, keywords = {Demographics, Disabilities, Health Conditions and Status}, doi = {10.1093/gerona/60.9.1206}, url = {http://biomedgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/content/60/9/1206.long}, author = {Linda A. Wray and Mary Beth Ofstedal and Kenneth M. Langa and Caroline S Blaum} } @article {6939, title = {Diabetes Diagnosis and Weight Loss in Middle-Aged Adults}, journal = {Research on Aging}, volume = {26}, year = {2004}, pages = {62-81}, publisher = {26}, abstract = {Using three waves of Health and Retirement Study data, this study investigated whether (a) self-reported physician-diagnosed diabetes prior to 1994 predicted weight loss between 1994 and 1996 in adults who were aged 51 to 61 and relatively healthy but overweight in 1992 (n = 2,642) and (b) socioeconomic status influenced that relationship. The authors found that these overweight middle-aged adults were at least 50 more likely to report that they lost at least 10 pounds of excess body weight if they had been diagnosed with diabetes than if they had not. Furthermore, the authors found that neither education nor net worth predicted weight loss in these adults. Identifying the social, psychological, and physiological mechanisms linking chronic conditions and health behaviors can inform policy makers and health care providers and enhance the development of effective interventions to prevent or reduce health risks in middle-aged and older adults.}, keywords = {Demographics, Health Conditions and Status, Healthcare}, doi = {10.1177/0164027503258741}, url = {http://roa.sagepub.com/content/26/1/62.abstract}, author = {Linda A. Wray and Caroline S Blaum and Mary Beth Ofstedal and A. Regula Herzog} } @article {6886, title = {Functional Status and Health Outcomes in Older Americans with Diabetes: Should diabetes management be targeted to health status?}, journal = {Journal of the American Geriatrics Society}, volume = {51}, year = {2003}, pages = {745-53}, publisher = {51}, abstract = {OBJECTIVES: To determine how baseline functional status affects health outcomes in older adults with diabetes mellitus (DM). DESIGN: Nationally representative cross-sectional and longitudinal health interview survey. SETTING: Waves I (1993) and II (1995) of the Assets and Health Dynamics of the Oldest Old Survey (AHEAD) in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: AHEAD respondents aged 70 and older (n = 7,447, including 995 with DM). MEASUREMENTS: At baseline, the entire sample was divided into three groups: high-functioning group, defined as having no physical limitations or instrumental activities of daily living/activities of daily living (IADL/ADL) disabilities (39\%); low-functioning group, having three or more limitations or IADL/ADL disabilities (24\%); and intermediate-functioning group, those in the middle (36\%). Older adults with and without DM, within each of the functioning groups, were compared at 2-year follow-up with respect to demographic characteristics, weight/body mass index, baseline and incident chronic diseases and conditions, and follow-up functioning. RESULTS: Of people aged 70 and older, 28\% with DM and 41\% without were high functioning; 38\% with DM and 22\% without were low functioning (both P < .001). High-functioning people with DM remained high functioning at 2 years but had a significantly higher incidence of heart disease and mortality than high-functioning people without DM. Low-functioning people with DM were significantly more likely to have vascular comorbidities at baseline than low-functioning people without DM, but their 2-year outcomes were similar. The intermediate-functioning group showed the most differences between those with and without DM; those with DM were significantly (P < .01) more likely to have baseline vascular disease, low cognitive performance, increased incident vascular disease, and significantly worse 2-year functioning and to have experienced falls (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Differences in baseline functional status in older adults with DM were associated with outcome differences. High-functioning older people with DM tended to remain high functioning but demonstrated significantly higher incidence of heart disease and mortality than those without DM, whereas low-functioning people with and without DM had similar outcomes. However, intermediate-functioning older diabetics had worse health and functioning outcomes than a similarly impaired group without DM. DM management adjusted to functional status can potentially address the most-relevant outcomes in the heterogeneous older population with DM.}, keywords = {Diabetes Mellitus, Functional status, Older Adults}, doi = {10.1046/j.1365-2389.2003.51256.x}, author = {Caroline S Blaum and Mary Beth Ofstedal and Kenneth M. Langa and Linda A. Wray} } @article {6790, title = {Informal caregiving for diabetes and diabetic complications among elderly americans.}, journal = {J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci}, volume = {57}, year = {2002}, month = {2002 May}, pages = {S177-86}, publisher = {57B}, abstract = {

OBJECTIVES: Little is known regarding the amount of time spent by unpaid caregivers providing help to elderly individuals for disabilities associated with diabetes mellitus (DM). We sought to obtain nationally representative estimates of the time, and associated cost, of informal caregiving provided to elderly individuals with diabetes, and to determine the complications of DM that contribute most significantly to the subsequent need for informal care.

METHODS: We estimated multivariable regression models using data from the 1993 Asset and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old Study, a nationally representative survey of people aged 70 or older (N = 7,443), to determine the weekly hours of informal caregiving and imputed cost of caregiver time for community-dwelling elderly individuals with and without a diagnosis of DM.

RESULTS: Those without DM received an average of 6.1 hr per week of informal care, those with DM taking no medications received 10.5 hr, those with DM taking oral medications received 10.1 hr, and those with DM taking insulin received 14.4 hr of care (p <.01). Disabilities related to heart disease, stroke, and visual impairment were important predictors of diabetes-related informal care. The total cost of informal caregiving for elderly individuals with diabetes in the United States was between $3 and $6 billion per year, similar to previous estimates of the annual paid long-term care costs attributable to DM.

DISCUSSION: Diabetes imposes a substantial burden on elderly individuals, their families, and society, both through increased rates of disability and the significant time that informal caregivers must spend helping address the associated functional limitations. Future evaluations of the costs of diabetes, and the cost-effectiveness of diabetes interventions, should consider the significant informal caregiving costs associated with the disease.

}, keywords = {Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Caregivers, Cost of Illness, Costs and Cost Analysis, Diabetes Complications, Diabetes Mellitus, Disabled Persons, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Male, Time Factors}, issn = {1079-5014}, doi = {10.1093/geronb/57.3.s177}, author = {Kenneth M. Langa and Sandeep Vijan and Rodney A. Hayward and M.E. Chernew and Caroline S Blaum and Mohammed U Kabeto and David R Weir and Steven J. Katz and Robert J. Willis and A. Mark Fendrick} } @article {6747, title = {Explaining the Role of Sex on Disability: A population-based study}, journal = {The Gerontologist}, volume = {41}, year = {2001}, pages = {499-510}, publisher = {41}, abstract = {PURPOSE: There is no clear consensus about how sex influences prevalent disability and through what mechanisms. We investigated whether sex had a direct independent effect on disability or whether sex had an interactive effect on the relationship between chronic diseases/conditions and disability, and whether these effects differed in middle-aged versus older adults. DESIGN AND METHODS: We used baseline data from two nationally representative health interview surveys, the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and the Study of Asset and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old (AHEAD), and disability and covariate measures that were nearly identical in both surveys. Logistic regression models tested the contributions of diseases, impairments, and demographic and social characteristics on difficulties with prevalent activities of daily living (ADLs), mobility, and strength. RESULTS: Models demonstrated no direct sex effect for ADL disability in either age group after adjusting for key covariates. However, sex did exert an indirect effect on ADL disability in older adults via musculoskeletal conditions and depressive symptoms. In contrast, female sex remained strongly associated with mobility and strength disability in both age groups, net of covariates. Major interactions were also significant, including a female sex/body mass index (BMI) interaction for mobility difficulty and several sex-disease interactions for strength disability in the middle-aged group. IMPLICATIONS: The effect of sex on ADL difficulty is largely explained by social and health-related covariates in middle-aged and older adults. In contrast, the independent association of female sex with decreased strength and mobility in both groups cannot be explained by our models{\textquoteright} social or health-related variables. In addition, the positive association of BMI with mobility difficulty is significantly worse for women than for men.}, keywords = {Demographics, Disabilities, Health Conditions and Status, Methodology}, doi = {10.1093/geront/41.4.499}, author = {Linda A. Wray and Caroline S Blaum} }