@article {8209, title = {Why Don{\textquoteright}t Lower-Income Individuals Have Retirement Saving Plans?}, journal = {Communities and Banking}, volume = {16}, year = {2015}, pages = {16-19}, publisher = {16}, abstract = {Lower-income individuals lower employment rate and the smaller probability of their working for an employer that offers pensions underlie the pension gap between higher- and lower-income groups.}, keywords = {Income, Pensions}, author = {April Yanyuan Wu and Matthew S. Rutledge and Penglase, Jacob} } @article {5868, title = {Will the Average Retirement Age Continue to Increase?}, year = {2015}, institution = {Boston, MA, Center for Retirement Research at Boston College}, abstract = {Using Health and Retirement Study (HRS) data, this paper examines how changes in individual workers past and present pension coverage, retirement incentives in Social Security, and retiree health insurance have contributed to retirement decisions for the 1931-1953 birth cohorts. It then uses these findings to project retirement behavior for the 1955-1987 cohorts in the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP). A key assumption is that younger cohorts will have no defined benefit (DB) pensions or retiree health coverage in their future jobs. A key limitation is the assumption of a stable relationship in each successive cohort between each factor and labor market decisions.}, keywords = {Employment and Labor Force, Pensions, Retirement Planning and Satisfaction, Social Security}, author = {Matthew S. Rutledge and Gillis, Christopher M. and Anthony Webb} } @inbook {5132, title = {What People Don{\textquoteright}t Know About Their Pensions and Social Security: An Analysis Using Linked Data from the Health and Retirement Study}, booktitle = {Public Policies and Private Pensions}, year = {2003}, note = {RDA 1996-005ProCite field[8]: eds.}, pages = {57-125}, publisher = {Brookings Institution}, organization = {Brookings Institution}, address = {Washington, DC}, abstract = {Pension plan descriptions from respondents to the 1992 Health and Retirement Study are compared with descriptions obtained from their employers. Earnings histories reported by respondents are compared with earnings histories from the Social Security Administration. The probability of linking employer pension data, which is two thirds for current jobs, and of obtaining permission to link an earnings history, which is over 70 percent, are not well explained by respondent characteristics. Half of respondents with linked pension data correctly identify plan type, and fewer than half identify, within one year, dates of eligibility for early and normal retirement benefits. Benefit reduction rates are essentially not reported. Respondents do better in reporting pension values, but the unexplained variation is still considerable. In contrast, respondent reported values together with other observables, account for 80 percent of the variation in pension values and 75 percent of the variation in covered earnings measured from linked records. Thus prospects are good for imputing plan values, but not for imputing the location or size of early retirement incentives. Our findings raise questions about how well respondents understand complex pension and Social Security rules.}, keywords = {Consumption and Savings, Employment and Labor Force, Income, Pensions, Retirement Planning and Satisfaction, Social Security}, url = {https://www.nber.org/papers/w7368}, author = {Alan L Gustman and Thomas L. Steinmeier}, editor = {William G. Gale and John B. Shoven and Mark J. Warshawsky} }