HRS Bibliography

Bibliography Search
Export 397 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Title is S  [Clear All Filters]

S

Benítez-Silva H, Heiland F. The Social Security Earnings Test and Work Incentives. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 2007;26(3):527.
Dominitz J, Manski CF, Heinz J. Social Security Expectations and Retirement Savings Decisions. Cambridge, MA: The National Bureau of Economic Research; 2001. doi:https://www.nber.org/papers/w8718.
Andrews M. Social Security giveth, medical costs taketh away. Chicago Tribune.
Coile C, Gruber J. Social Security Incentives for Retirement. In: Wise DA, ed. Themes in the Economics of Aging. Themes in the Economics of Aging. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press; 2001.
Hou W, Sanzenbacher GT. Social Security Is a Great Equalizer. Center for Retirement Research; 2020.
Gustman AL, Steinmeier TL. Social Security, Pensions and Retirement Behaviour Within the Family. Journal of Applied Econometrics. 2004;19(6):723-737.
Coile C. Social Security, Pensions, and the Retirement Decisions of Individuals and Couples. 1999.
van der Klaauw W, Wolpin KI. Social Security, Pensions and the Savings and Retirement Behavior of Households. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; 2002.
Coile C, Milligan KS, Wise DA. Social Security Programs and Retirement Around the World: Disability Insurance Programs and Retirement - Introduction and Summary. NBER; 2014. doi:10.3386/w20120.
Brown M. Social Security Reform and the Exchange of Bequests for Elder Care. Center for Retirement Research at Boston College; 2003.
United States General Accounting Office. Social Security Reform: Implications for Women s Retirement Income. Washington, DC, U.S. General Accounting Office; 1997.
Cackley APuente. Social Security Reform: Implications for Women's Retirement Income. Washington, DC, United States General Accounting Office; 1997.
United States General Accounting Office. Social Security Reform: Implications of Raising the Retirement Age. Washington, DC, U.S. General Accounting Office; 1999.
United States General Accounting Office. Social Security Reform: Raising Retirement Ages Improves Program Solvency but May Cause Hardship for Some. U.S. General Accounting Office; 1998.
Bovbjerg BD. Social Security Reform: Raising Retirement Ages Improves Program Solvency but May Cause Hardship for Some. GAO Testimony before the Special Committee on Aging, U.S. Senate. 1998;GAO/T-HEHS-98-207(July).
United States Governmental Office. Social Security Reform: Raising the Retirement Ages Would Have Implications for Older Workers and SSA Disability Rolls. Washington, DC, U.S. Government Accountability Office; 2010.
Phillips JWR, Mitchell OS. Social Security Replacement Rates for Alternative Earnings Benchmarks. The University of Michigan, Michigan Retirement Research Center; 2006.
Mitchell OS, Phillips JWR. Social Security Replacement Rates for Alternative Earnings Benchmarks. Benefits Quarterly. 2006;22(4):37.
Burkhauser RV, Gustman AL, Laitner J, Mitchell OS, Sonnega A. Social Security Research at the Michigan Retirement Research Center. Social Security Bulletin. 2009;69(4):51-64.
Burkhauser RV, Gustman AL, Laitner J, Mitchell OS, Sonnega A. Social Security Research at the Michigan Retirement Research Center. Social Security Bulletin. 2009;69(4).
Van Wesep EP. Social Security: What is it good for?. 2001.
Gustman AL, Steinmeier TL, Tabatabai N. The Social Security Windfall Elimination and Government Pension Offset Provisions for Public Employees in the Health and Retirement Study. Ann Arbor, The University of Michigan; 2013.
Gustman AL, Steinmeier TL, Tabatabai N. The Social Security Windfall Elimination and Government Pension Offset Provisions for Public Employees in the Health and Retirement Study. Social Security Bulletin. 2014;74(3):55-69.
Bucciol A, Cavasso B, Zarri L. Social Status and Personality Traits. Journal of Economic Psychology. 2015;51:245-260. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2015.10.002.
Wray LA, Alwin DF, McCammon RJ. Social Status and Risky Health Behaviors: Results From the Health and Retirement Study. Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological and Social Sciences. 2005;60B(Special Issue 2):S85-S92.