Racial disparities and temporal trends in dementia misdiagnosis risk in the United States

TitleRacial disparities and temporal trends in dementia misdiagnosis risk in the United States
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2019
AuthorsGianattasio, KZ, Prather, C, M. Glymour, M, Ciarleglio, A, Power, MC
JournalAlzheimer's and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions
ISSN Number23528737
KeywordsAged, algorithm, ancestry group, Article, Black person, Caucasian, Dementia, diagnostic error, ethnic group, Female, health disparity, human, ICD-9-CM, major clinical study, Male, Medicare, priority journal, Retirement, risk factor, sensitivity analysis, Sensitivity and Specificity, United States

Introduction: Systematic disparities in misdiagnosis of dementia across racial/ethnic groups have implications for health disparities. We compared the risk of dementia under- and overdiagnosis in clinical settings across racial/ethnic groups from 2000 to 2010. Methods: We linked fee-for-service Medicare claims to participants aged ≥70 from the nationally representative Health and Retirement Study. We classified dementia status using an algorithm with similar sensitivity and specificity across racial/ethnic groups and assigned clinical dementia diagnosis status using ICD-9-CM codes from Medicare claims. Multinomial logit models were used to estimate relative risks of clinical under- and overdiagnosis between groups and over time. Results: Non-Hispanic blacks had roughly double the risk of underdiagnosis as non-Hispanic whites. While primary analyses suggested a shrinking disparity over time, this was not robust to sensitivity analyses or adjustment for covariates. Risk of overdiagnosis increased over time in both groups. Discussion: Our results suggest that efforts to reduce racial disparities in underdiagnosis are warranted. © 2019 The Authors

Citation KeyGianattasio2019891
PubMed ID31890853
PubMed Central IDPMC6926355