Quest for a summary measure of biological age: the health and retirement study.

TitleQuest for a summary measure of biological age: the health and retirement study.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2021
AuthorsCrimmins, EM, Thyagarajan, B, Kim, JKi, Weir, DR, Faul, JD
JournalGeroscience
Volume43
Issue1
Pagination395-408
ISSN Number2509-2723
KeywordsBiological age, Biomarkers, Phenotypic age, TAME markers
Abstract

Measures of biological age and its components have been shown to provide important information about individual health and prospective change in health as there is clear value in being able to assess whether someone is experiencing accelerated or decelerated aging. However, how to best assess biological age remains a question. We compare prediction of health outcomes using existing summary measures of biological age with a measure created by adding novel biomarkers related to aging to measures based on more conventional clinical chemistry and exam measures. We also compare the explanatory power of summary biological age measures compared to the individual biomarkers used to construct the measures. To accomplish this, we examine how well biological age, phenotypic age, and expanded biological age and five sets of individual biomarkers explain variability in four major health outcomes linked to aging in a large, nationally representative cohort of older Americans. We conclude that different summary measures of accelerated aging do better at explaining different health outcomes, and that chronological age has greater explanatory power for both cognitive dysfunction and mortality than the summary measures. In addition, we find that there is reduction in the variance explained in health outcomes when indicators are combined into summary measures, and that combining clinical indicators with more novel markers related to aging does best at explaining health outcomes. Finally, it is hard to define a set of assays that parsimoniously explains the greatest amount of variance across the range of health outcomes studied here. All of the individual markers considered were related to at least one of the health outcomes.

DOI10.1007/s11357-021-00325-1
Citation Key11422
PubMed ID33544281
Grant ListR01 AG060110 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States
U01 AG009740 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States