Development and validation of novel multimorbidity indices for older adults.

TitleDevelopment and validation of novel multimorbidity indices for older adults.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of PublicationForthcoming
AuthorsSteinman, MA, Jing, B, Shah, SJ, Rizzo, A, Lee, SJ, Covinsky, KE, Ritchie, CS, W Boscardin, J
JournalJournal of the American Geriatrics Society
ISSN Number1532-5415
Keywordsclaims data, functional impairment, multimorbidity, prognostic models

BACKGROUND: Measuring multimorbidity in claims data is used for risk adjustment and identifying populations at high risk for adverse events. Multimorbidity indices such as Charlson and Elixhauser scores have important limitations. We sought to create a better method of measuring multimorbidity using claims data by incorporating geriatric conditions, markers of disease severity, and disease-disease interactions, and by tailoring measures to different outcomes.

METHODS: Health conditions were assessed using Medicare inpatient and outpatient claims from subjects age 67 and older in the Health and Retirement Study. Separate indices were developed for ADL decline, IADL decline, hospitalization, and death, each over 2 years of follow-up. We validated these indices using data from Medicare claims linked to the National Health and Aging Trends Study.

RESULTS: The development cohort included 5012 subjects with median age 76 years; 58% were female. Claims-based markers of disease severity and disease-disease interactions yielded minimal gains in predictive power and were not included in the final indices. In the validation cohort, after adjusting for age and sex, c-statistics for the new multimorbidity indices were 0.72 for ADL decline, 0.69 for IADL decline, 0.72 for hospitalization, and 0.77 for death. These c-statistics were 0.02-0.03 higher than c-statistics from Charlson and Elixhauser indices for predicting ADL decline, IADL decline, and hospitalization, and <0.01 higher for death (p < 0.05 for each outcome except death), and were similar to those from the CMS-HCC model. On decision curve analysis, the new indices provided minimal benefit compared with legacy approaches. C-statistics for both new and legacy indices varied substantially across derivation and validation cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS: A new series of claims-based multimorbidity measures were modestly better at predicting hospitalization and functional decline than several legacy indices, and no better at predicting death. There may be limited opportunity in claims data to measure multimorbidity better than older methods.

Citation Key12851
PubMed ID36282202
Grant ListP01AG066605 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States
P01 AG066605 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States
R01AG052041 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States
R01 AG057751 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States
K24AG066998 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States
R01AG057751 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States
P30AG044281 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States