End-of-life medical treatment choices: do survival chances and out-of-pocket costs matter?

TitleEnd-of-life medical treatment choices: do survival chances and out-of-pocket costs matter?
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2008
AuthorsChao, L-W, Pagán, JA, Soldo, BJ
JournalMed Decis Making
Volume28
Issue4
Pagination511-23
Date Published2008 Jul-Aug
ISSN Number0272-989X
Call Numbernewpubs20090302_Chao_etal.pdf
KeywordsAged, Choice Behavior, Female, Financing, Personal, Health Care Costs, Humans, Life Expectancy, Male, Medicare, Neoplasms, Socioeconomic factors, Terminal Care, United States
Abstract

<p><b>BACKGROUND: </b>Out-of-pocket medical expenditures incurred prior to the death of a spouse could deplete savings and impoverish the surviving spouse. Little is known about the public's opinion as to whether spouses should forego such end-of-life (EOL) medical care to prevent asset depletion.</p><p><b>OBJECTIVES: </b>To analyze how elderly and near elderly adults assess hypothetical EOL medical treatment choices under different survival probabilities and out-of-pocket treatment costs.</p><p><b>METHODS: </b>Survey data on a total of 1143 adults, with 589 from the Asset and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old (AHEAD) and 554 from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), were used to study EOL cancer treatment recommendations for a hypothetical anonymous married woman in her 80s.</p><p><b>RESULTS: </b>Respondents were more likely to recommend treatment when it was financed by Medicare than by the patient's own savings and when it had 60% rather than 20% survival probability. Black and male respondents were more likely to recommend treatment regardless of survival probability or payment source. Treatment uptake was related to the order of presentation of treatment options, consistent with starting point bias and framing effects.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS: </b>Elderly and near elderly adults would recommend that the hypothetical married woman should forego costly EOL treatment when the costs of the treatment would deplete savings. When treatment costs are covered by Medicare, respondents would make the recommendation to opt for care even if the probability of survival is low, which is consistent with moral hazard. The sequence of presentation of treatment options seems to affect patient treatment choice.</p>

Notes

PMID 18441252

DOI10.1177/0272989X07312713
User Guide Notes

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18441252?dopt=Abstract

Endnote Keywords

Economics of the Elderly/Medical Expenditures/Survival/Survivors/Saving

Endnote ID

19770

Alternate JournalMed Decis Making
Citation Key7190
PubMed ID18441252
PubMed Central IDPMC2587497
Grant ListP30 AG 12836 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States
K01 TW 06658 / TW / FIC NIH HHS / United States
P30 AG012836-14 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States
P30 AG012836 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States
K01 TW006658 / TW / FIC NIH HHS / United States