2SLS versus 2SRI: Appropriate methods for rare outcomes and/or rare exposures

Title2SLS versus 2SRI: Appropriate methods for rare outcomes and/or rare exposures
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2018
AuthorsBasu, A, Coe, N, Chapman, CG
JournalHealth Economics
Volume27
Issue6
Pagination937 - 955
Date PublishedJan-06-2018
ISSN Number10579230
KeywordsClinical trials, Health Care Outcomes, Insurance, Monte-Carlo Simulations
Abstract

This study used Monte Carlo simulations to examine the ability of the two‐stage least squares (2SLS) estimator and two‐stage residual inclusion (2SRI) estimators with varying forms of residuals to estimate the local average and population average treatment effect parameters in models with binary outcome, endogenous binary treatment, and single binary instrument. The rarity of the outcome and the treatment was varied across simulation scenarios. Results showed that 2SLS generated consistent estimates of the local average treatment effects (LATE) and biased estimates of the average treatment effects (ATE) across all scenarios. 2SRI approaches, in general, produced biased estimates of both LATE and ATE under all scenarios. 2SRI using generalized residuals minimized the bias in ATE estimates. Use of 2SLS and 2SRI is illustrated in an empirical application estimating the effects of long‐term care insurance on a variety of binary health care utilization outcomes among the near‐elderly using the Health and Retirement Study.

URLhttp://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/hec.v27.6http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/hec.3647http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1002/hec.3647/fullpdfhttps://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fhec.3647
DOI10.1002/hec.v27.610.1002/hec.3647
Short TitleHealth Economics
Citation Key9603